Read, Eat, Drink — Weekend Roundup

A weekly round-up of books, news, thoughts, recipes, and miscellany for the weekend. 

NY-times-2
Source.

The New York Times Innovation Report: I’ve been blathering to anyone who will listen about the Innovation Report for a few weeks, and I’m not quite done being evangelical about it. Neither is the Nieman Journalism Lab (a project of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard), which called it “one of the key documents of this media age.” The Innovation Report was intended only for internal use at the Times, but when it was leaked it offered the entire journalism and media world a candid and surprising look at how one of our greatest media organizations is struggling in the digital age.

There are lots of incredibly valuable takeaways in the report, (here are six of the top takeaways, according to Mashable), but I think the broader picture that the report paints of the Times is just as valuable. The New York Times is struggling to stay relevant, and it’s falling woefully behind in the areas of digital innovation that have become pillars of success in this Internet age. Even in the past five years, the media game has changed drastically, and at an alarmingly fast rate–the type of rate that inevitably favors start-ups and leaner, digital-first organizations. That’s why media organizations that have only been around for a few years–sites like Buzzfeed and the Huffington Post–have already surpassed the Times in traffic and are successfully poaching talent from their newsroom.

The Times still operates with the expectation that readers will come to them, rather than realizing that they have to find readers where they already are. The report cites the classic Kodak case study of how that company swiftly lost market dominance when new technology changed the photography industry. The takeaway from that study is that Kodak thought they were in the business of film, but really they were in the business of memories. The Times still operates like they are in the business of newspapers, when really they are in the business of information. People adapt swiftly to new methods for reaching a goal (whether the goal is preserving memories or staying informed), and so companies should focus on the goal itself, and not try to hem customers into existing pathways simply because they are already established. For the Times that means adapting to a world where people increasingly want to read their news online, and for traditional book publishers, editors, and agents that means remembering that we are first and foremost in the business of stories and information, and only secondarily in the business of books, ebooks, apps, or any format-specific product.

This is exciting, important stuff, especially for anyone who works in traditional media like I do! If you read anything about the future of media this year, read this. The full leaked report can be found here.

Soccer, Sausages, and Beer: In case talking about the future of media has you all wound up (…just me?), go ahead and wind down with a World Cup game, a sausage, and a beer. What’s better to start the weekend than some futbol, cased meat, and brewed happiness? Bon Appétit did a great round up of The World Cup of Sausage, where you can find sausages from every country participating in the World Cup. And then pick out a beer to match from this list, which lists the most popular beer for each World Cup country.

sausage-world-cupFINAL-620x412
Source.

And if you’re a Brazil fan like me and want to start the weekend off with a big smile, watch this New York Times video collage of Brazilians reacting to their first World Cup goal. It’s kind of hilarious and adorable and infectiously exciting!

How John Green built an army of fans (and how any writer can do the same!)

how john green sold so many books

Get one free tip for reading more + living better each week!

In case you’ve been living in another galaxy, The Fault In Our Stars movie (based on the eponymous book) debuted in theaters nationwide this weekend. It topped the weekend box office with a $48 million domestic debut, easily crushing Tom Cruise’s new action flick “Edge of Tomorrow,” which did only $29 million in sales. Not bad for a movie geared to a younger audience, with two fairly unknown actors, and an unconventional female protagonist (she has cancer and wears an oxygen tube in her nose).

I think it’s safe to say that the movie was so successful because the book was so successful. But why was the book such a blowout bestseller? Well, my guess is that it’s because John Green has been so successful at building a platform. Which goes to show that, even for fiction writers, building a platform really matters.

Obviously, the book is wonderful, and no amount of platform magic can bolster a lackluster book. But The Fault In Our Stars was a #1 bestseller on Amazon SIX MONTHS before it was even published. That is, thousands of people ordered the book before anyone on the planet had even read it (except for the editor and publishing team, of course).

So why did all those people spend their hard earned money on a book they knew so little about? My theory is simple: they really like John Green. And they really like John Green (and know who he is at all), because of his platform. I’ve seen so many readers, editors, literary agents, and other folks practically swoon when talking about John Green. I don’t see that same visceral, emotionally connected reaction happening for other mega authors, even those with very loyal followings like John Grisham. The difference? One author has a robust, lively, and authentic online platform, and the other not quite as much.

I’m sure 95% of TFiOS book-buyers have never laid eyes on John Green in real life. But millions of his fans see him a few times a week through his hilarious YouTube videos, his blog, and his endless Twitter stream. Those online outlets aren’t just fun hobbies and avenues for self-expression. They’re the pillars of a platform (as I discussed here), and they are powerful tools for connecting with people. They create a direct, one-to-one connection between authors and readers, and they allow readers to feel like they really know an author–like the author is their friend, not just a name on a book jacket. That direct connection is just as valuable for fiction authors as it is for nonfiction authors–who wouldn’t want a whole army of Nerdfighters (or whatever you’d call your army!) ready to support all your work?

But it’s one thing to set up all those accounts and then avoid them like the plague, or feel horribly self-conscious about being your true self on them. But John Green is all over all his social channels every day, and he’s funny and genuine and adorkable. He’s completely himself, and he comes across as just a nice guy. He’s not “marketing” or “engaging with a fanbase”–he’s just talking to his readers, sharing his conversations with his brother, and trying to help people through his work.

The New Yorker profile about how John Green built an army of fans was completely fascinating to me. I will admit that I haven’t read The Fault In Our Stars or seen the movie, but I somehow still teared up at the end of The New Yorker profile. (Yes, I’m a sap.) It’s obvious how much goodwill John Green has earned from his fans, and how he’s done so just by being an accessible and approachable guy. John Green isn’t just out there to sell books–he’s giving his time, energy, and money toward charitable causes; he’s a friend to a girl who died of terminal cancer; he’s a husband and a dad and a brother and a writer. How could anyone not like a guy like that and want to see him succeed?

He also treats his fans like friends, rather than his subjects, which is an incredibly important distinction. He signed the entire first printing of The Fault In Our Stars (that’s 150,000 books, hand-signed), even though it caused him to need physical therapy for his shoulder and would probably have driven the rest of us completely loony. That’s a guy that, in my opinion, feels a strong sense of appreciation for the people who support him and understands that the fandom of a reader is something to be earned. A dedicated readership is not something you’re entitled to simply because you wrote a wonderful book–it’s something you must earn by being in service to the reader.

I thought this passage from The New Yorker profile particularly zeroed in on the difference between the writing life of yore and the new John-Green-esque lifestyle:

“Green’s online projects keep proliferating along with his fans, and he seems determined to keep up with them all. He told me that he has sketched out some scenes for a new novel, about “two male best friends who live less privileged lives in a world of privilege,” and that he hopes to work on it after the movie junkets are over and he has taken a few days of vacation with his family, in a Tennessee farmhouse devoid of electronic devices. One wonders, however, when he’ll actually find the hours to recline in the La-Z-Boy. E. Lockhart, an acclaimed Y.A. novelist, is an old friend of Green’s. She said, “Most of us look at what John does and say ‘That’s awesome,’ but we’d rather be in our pajamas writing.”

While I’m a big believer that periods of unconnectedness from electronic devices are one of the most important sanity-maintainers these days, I think we’re also moving past the days when it was enough to write a great book, publish it, and call it a day. If we all hung out in our pajamas all day, hermited away from the world, we’d miss the sense of connection that drives us as human beings. And we’d also miss the opportunity to help more people through our work. I think authors should remember that platform building isn’t about helping yourself by selling your work, but about helping others through your work.

And the best way to reach the most people is to be, like John Green, both accessible and approachable. Being accessible to your readers means they can find you and connect with you, and being approachable to them means they might just start to really like you, and not just your writing.

Get more insider advice on writing, platform-building, and publishing by signing up below!

Get one free tip for reading more + living better each week!

What is an author platform?

do writers need an author platform to get published

This is the #1 question I get from people who are just starting to test the waters of nonfiction publishing. What is a platform, and why the heck does it matter? Shouldn’t writers just focus on honing their craft and revising their manuscripts, and worry about actually selling copies of the book once (and if) it’s actually published?

Well, that’s how it used to work. Writers used to be able to hole up in dark offices for years as they perfected their book, and once published, they could just sit back as the critical acclaim and sales came rolling in. And to a degree, some extremely well-established writers can still do that. But 99.9% of authors need to take the promotion of their book into their own hands, or that book will never make it into a reader’s hands. And the best way to get eyeballs reading the words you toiled over? Build a platform that attracts those eyeballs, even before you have a book to share with them.

Read More